Skip to main content

Ads

loading...

Featured Post

Disney Plus Release Date, Price, Exclusive Shows & UK Launch

Here's what to expect from Disney's upcoming Netflix rival Disney+, including when it's launching, how much it'll cost, and what you'll be able to watch on it
Disney is the latest company to wade into the film and TV streaming game with Disney+ - or Disney Plus if you prefer - a new streaming service that will let you watch all of the Mouse House's best and brightest in one place.

Ads

ads

Flipboard

Flipboard

Samsung 970 Evo Review

Samsung 970 Evo Review
PRICE WHEN REVIEWED
  • US$109.99 (250GB); US$449.99 (1TB)
Samsung unveiled the 960 Evo NVMe drive back in September 2016 and, along with it, the insanely fast 960 Pro series. For those PC owners wanting to exceed the speed limits of SATA, these drives offered gigabytes per second read and writes using the M.2 NVMe PCIe interface.

Now Samsung has launched the 970 Evo, but is it more of the same, marginally better or a significant boost from the 960? Let's find out.

PRICE & AVAILABILITY
Last updated>>>(21/November/2018)
Black Friday deal: Get the 500GB 970 EVO for just £89 in the Amazon UK sale, or 1TB for £175.
(21/November/2018)<<<Last updated

The price for the 1TB model is £375.79 from Amazon, and it looks likely to remain at that level for a while. That’s only a fiver less than the previous 960 Evo 1TB, suggesting that Samsung thinks the 970 EVO is worth just as much.

In the US it costs $525.95 from Amazon.com.

There are other capacities of course, with 250GB, 500GB and 2TB options costing £100.79 / US$109.99, £193.79 / US$249.08 and £709.99 respectively. A quick calculation reveals that the larger drive you get the lower the cost per GB they are, making the 2TB the best value and the 250GB the least.

The Intel 1TB 600P is cheaper, but isn’t in the same performance envelope. ADATA has the SX8000 with similar performance to the 600P, but is asking another 20 percentfor it. Plextor is in the same boat with the M9PeG 1TB, a drive that has been overtaken by developments.

Ironically, much of the initial competition for the 970 Evo is likely to come from older Samsung products as older models become discounted to clear old stock - so watch out for bargain 960 Evo drives.

The other threat comes from Western Digital, and other SSD makers willing to leverage the 64-bit NAND that Micron and Toshiba are providing to many brands. While the price of NVMe storage is stubbornly high, Samsung can do well with the 970 Evo, but that scenario won’t last forever.

Samsung 970 EVO price


FEATURES AND DESIGN
All M.2 NVMe drives look almost identical, so there is little point discussing the aesthetics of the 970 Evo compared with any other.

It’s inside where the action is, and comparing the new design to its 960 Evo predecessor, there are some notable changes. The prior 960 Evo used the cheaper TLC V-NAND, where the 970 Evo uses MLC V-NAND, the same expensive flash technology with which the 960 Pro was blessed.

Being closer to the Pro design, the 970 Evo should outperform the 960 Evo easily, but will it also eclipse the 960 Pro?

The success of any SSD design is determined by how the controller and cache memory are integrated with the NAND modules, and how effectively that fusion allows their true performance to be exploited.

Where the 960 Evo used up to 1GB of LPDDR3 memory for its cache, the new 970 Evo uses LPDDR4 memory, and on the 2TB drive it has 2GB of that available.

Using a new memory model has required a new controller, and Samsung has introduced the Phoenix to replace the Polaris controller used on the 960 Evo.

The upshot of these changes is that where the 960 Evo maxed out at 3,200MB/s reads and ranged from 1,500 MB/s to 1,900MB/s writes (dependent on drive capacity). The 970 Evo is quoted as offering 3,400-3,500MB/s writes and reads that go from 1,500MB/s on the 256GB model, up to 2,500MB/s on the 1TB and 2TB options.

IOPS across the board are also massively boosted with the 1TB and 2TB 970 Evo delivering a massive 500k read IOPS on QD 32 four thread testing. That’s 31 percent more IOPS than the best the 960 Evo could achieve, and it manages this while only using 0.3 watts extra power.

Enough of the claimed figures... how does it perform on our bench tests?

SAMSUNG 970 EVO BENCHMARKS
Samsung kindly provided us with a 1TB 970 Evo for testing.  The fly in this ointment was a new PCIe NVMe driver that Samsung provided which altered the way that the 970 EVO worked and caused us to question the validity of our results.

In many tests, the drive worked precisely as predicted, but in other applications it underperformed for no obvious good reason.

We eventually concluded that these discrepancies are side effects from the organisation of the buffers in this device to negate the impact of random write traffic striking when the drive is least able to handle it.

The TurboWrite buffer is designed to reduce the impact of very large files being thrown at the device, which on the previous 960 Evo caused the drive to write at speeds on par with SATA SSD speeds.

The 960 Evo did have a TubroWrite buffer, but it didn’t seem to work as well as the one on the 970 Evo for handling really big file writes.

On the 970 Evo, the TurboWrite buffer is 6GB by default on the 1TB model and an additional 36GB that it can dynamically open up if you throw everything including the kitchen sink at the drive.

The the cache is smaller on the smaller 250GB and 500GB models, and the amount of Intelligent reserve scales to up to 72GB on the 2TB drive. Therefore if you are editing video, for example, the 2TB drive has a TurboWrite total space of 78GB, where the 1TB only has 42GB.

Once you hit these limits the 2,500MB/s writing drops to 1,200MB/s on the 1TB, and just 300MB/s and 600MB/s on the 250GB and 500GB drives respectively.

The AS SSD benchmark version 1.9 could also create the same effect by disabling buffers, and under that situation the previous 960 Evo 1TB would only write at 400MB/s.

That problem looks effectively fixed in the 970 Evo because on that test write performance was a sustained 2,245MB/s, very little below its normal operating levels. And without sending a file of more than 42GB in size, this is the performance that Samsung claims.

However, in the same test read speed suffered without buffers, showing how solving one problem might have created another elsewhere.

With buffers active, the default scenario, read speeds on CrystalDiskMark 6.0 hit a blistering 3,571MB/s and write was equally impressive 2,497 MB/s. That test is revealing for small file sizes, exactly where the 970 Evo excels.

Overall, these are impressive numbers and eclipse the previous 960 Evo, and the 2TB 960 Pro we’ve both previously tested.

The only real concern for Samsung is likely to be in which direction to go from here. Without using more than four PCIe channels, there is very little additional bandwidth on reading speed to exploit.

The next generation of drives might use less power and offer greater capacities, but they’re unlikely to be going much faster than the 970 Evo and 970 Pro.

Tests we can’t do
There is one set of tests we’d love to do, but don’t have the resources to allocate to finding out where the limit is for total bytes written.

Accepting the quoted numbers, the 970 Evo has dramatically better TBW (Total Bytes Written) than the 960 Evo, making it more suitable for those situations where the drive has large amounts of data regularly written to it.

The 1TB model reviewed here has a 600TB lifespan and the 2TB model doubles that value to 1,200TB. In both cases, that’s plenty of new files written, every day, for years and years.

At each capacity that’s 50 percent more bytes written over the life than the 960 Evo, though it slightly lags the 960 Pro by 25 percent until it hits the 2TB capacity.

The 970 Pro doesn’t have a 2TB option currently, so the lifespan of the 2TB 970 Evo is the best on offer until Samsung releases a 2TB Pro at that size.


Capacity
250GB
500GB
1TB
2TB
TBW (Total Bytes Written)
970 Evo
150TB
300TB
600TB
1,200TB
970 Pro
N/A
600TB
1,200TB
N/A
960 Evo
100TB
200TB
400TB
N/A
960 Pro
N/A
400TB
800TB
1,200TB
SPECS
  • Samsung 970 Evo: Specs
  • Capacities: 250GB/500GB/1TB/2TB
  • Capacity tested: 1TB
  • Tested 4KB performance: 47.17/146.3 MB/s
  • Tested sequential performance: 3571.5/2496.7 MB/s
  • Controller: Samsung Phoenix Controller
  • Encryption: AES 256-bit
  • Flash technology: Samsung V-NAND 3bit MLC
  • Connection: PCIe Gen3 x4, NVMe 1.3
  • Claimed power consumption: 6W active / 30 mW idle
  • Warranty: 5 years
  • Form Factor: M.2 80mm Single Sided


Comments

ads

loading...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Loading...

Popular posts from this blog

Game Of Thrones Season 8 - End Game With Sinhala Subtitles

Huawei Mate 20 X 5G Is First Huawei 5G Phone To Go On Sale In UK

Huawei has confirmed that its first 5G phone will arrive in the UK next month as the Mate 20 X 5G.
A larger version of the Huawei Mate 20, the Mate 20 X has some interesting additions, not least of all in this new edition support for 5G, which promises mobile data speeds 20 times that of 4G. Today Huawei has confirmed the Mate 20 X 5G will go on sale in the UK in June at £999.

Mark Zuckerberg Builds A Sleep Box For Wife To Have A Peaceful Sleep

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg expressed his love and gratitude by making an innovative wooden ‘sleep box’ for his wife Priscilla to have a peaceful sleep at night. The American tech entrepreneur, took his Instagram account and showed off his invention that helps his wife to sleep peacefully through the night as she cares for their children. The invention is known as the sleep box and emits a faint light between 6 am and 7 am so, Priscilla Chan can know that their two toddler daughters are about to wake up, without the need to have to check her phone.

Oppo Reno Review: Hands-on

The Oppo Reno boasts the strangest slider yet: a pivoting pop-up selfie camera that slides out at an angle
Should I Buy The Oppo Reno?
If you’re here for the camera then the Oppo Reno isn’t too exciting beyond that mega megapixel count. But as a cheaper way to get a full-screen phone with that wacky pop-up, it’s easy to see why the Reno might appeal.

Best eReader 2019

You can read a book on your phone or tablet but you'll get a much better experience on a dedicated device. Here are the best eReaders you can buy in 2019.
What's The Best E-Reader You Can Buy? With an eReader, you'll never be stuck for something to read.
The choice of eReaders is getting slimmer and slimmer, with only Amazon and Kobo releasing a range of new models recently. That doesn't mean eBooks are going away. It's just that more and more people are using their smartphone or tablet to read books.

Like Fan Page