Skip to main content

Featured Post

Amazon Last Minute Christmas Sale Save Big On Tech After Black Friday

It's not too late to pick up tech gifts from Amazon. It's Last Minute Christmas Deals sale has discounts across smart home, laptops, monitors, speakers and other gadgets.

Samsung Galaxy S9 vs LG G7 ThinQ

Samsung Galaxy S9 vs LG G7 ThinQ
  • Samsung Galaxy S9: US$719
  • Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus: US$840
  • LG G7 ThinQ: TBC
Both hailing from South Korea, Samsung and LG have battled for years to build the best Android smartphones in the world. Samsung is winning the popularity contest, but is its latest Galaxy S9 better than the LG G7 ThinQ?

LG’s oddly named flagship is a notch-toting challenge to Samsung’s safe-but-svelte S9. Here we compare the two phones to see which is worth your time – and money.

The Samsung Galaxy S9 retails for £739/$719 but as is the case with Samsung phones always, the price goes down pretty fast.

Check the price on Amazon UK and Amazon US.

The Galaxy S9 Plus is a little more at £869/$839.

Even on launch day, LG did not announce the price of the G7 ThinQ, which is a worry. LG tends to release phones a loing time after announcement, so we hope that isn’t the case here.

We’d hope the G7 ThinQ is more affordable than the S9, and it’ll probably be £699/$699.

The Galaxy S9 looks a lot like the S8, which is no bad thing as it’s a very attractive phone. The pebble like curve of the edges of the front and back of the phone is one of the most premium on the market whether you plump for the S9 or S9 Plus.

The glass construction is a fingerprint magnet though, and fragile to boot. The G7 also has a glass construction, and like the S9 is wireless charging compatible.

All three phones also have fingerprint scanners on the back, though the G7’s is better placed and a better, circular shape. But it is the first time in ages that LG didn’t make it a physical button – instead the power button is on the right-hand side, like on the S9.

While the S9 fixed the rubbish fingerprint sensor placement of the S8, it’s still a weird position and shape, right below the camera.

The G7 decides to go for a notch at the top of its display where the S9 has symmetrical curves. Both have chins at the bottom of the device despite not having a fingerprint sensor.
All three devices are superbly premium, but your decision will come down to the colours available in your region and if that notch on the G7 really bothers you. The S9s are more immediately impressive design-wise.

Here is a run-down of the specs of the Galaxy S9, S9 Plus and the LG G7 ThinQ:

Galaxy S9Galaxy S9+LG G7 ThinQ
Operating SystemAndroid 8.0 OreoAndroid 8.0 OreoAndroid 8.0 Oreo
Display5.8in Quad HD+ (2960x1440) 18.5:9 SuperAMOLED Infinity Display6.2in Quad HD+ (2960x1440) 18.5:9 SuperAMOLED Infinity Display6.1in (3120x1440) 19.5:9 IPS LCD
ProcessorExynos 9810 octa-coreExynos 9810 octa-coreQualcomm Snapdragon 845
Storage64GB (expandable up to 400GB via microSD) 128GB (expandable up to 400GB via microSD) 64GB/128GB
Primary Camera12Mp  f/1.5-2.4 camera with OIS12Mp  f/1.5-2.4 camera with OIS + 13Mp telephoto camera16Mp f/1.6 + 16Mp f/1.9 wide-angle cameras
Front Camera8Mp8Mp8Mp
Video Recording4K @ 60fps, Super slo-mo 720p @ 960fps4K @ 60fps, Super slo-mo 720p @ 960fps2160p @ 30fps, 1080p @ 60fps
WiFi11ac dual-band11ac dual-band11ac dual-band
Bluetooth5.0 with aptX5.0 with aptX5.0 with aptX HD
Biometric authenticationFingerprint scannerFingerprint scannerFingerprint scanner
Wireless chargingYesYesYes
ColoursMidnight Black, Coral Blue, Titanium Gray, Liliac Purple Midnight Black, Coral Blue, Titanium Gray, Liliac Purple Platinum Gray, Aurora Black, Moroccan Blue, Raspberry Rose
PortsUSB-C, 3.5mm Headphone jackUSB-C, 3.5mm Headphone jackUSB-C, 3.5mm Headphone jack
Dimensions69x148x8.5mm73.8x158x8.5mm153.2 x 71.9 x 7.9 mm
In 2018 you won’t be disappointed with the specs of either of these smartphones. In the US and China, the S9 and S9 Plus have the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, the same chip that’s in the LG G7 ThinQ.

In the global variant, including the UK, the S9 has the Samsung Exynos 9810. It performs pretty much exactly the same as the 845, and you won’t the differences in real world use.

By the way, ThinQ is LG’s branding that suggests its products are smart – you’ll also find it on washing machines and other white goods it makes. It didn’t need to put it on the phone, and it’s an odd move, but that’s why it’s there.

The displays on the phones are tall, as is the 2018 fashion, but there are some differences. The Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus tote 18.5:9 OLED panels where the LG G7 has a 19.5:9 LCD.

All get incredibly bright, the G7 noticeably so considering LCDs generally don’t go so bright. The G7 has a notch at the top whereas the S9 has thin bezels on the top and bottom. Which you prefer is up to you, but we think the slickness of the S9 edges it.

Notches are not subtle, and there’s actually a software option on the G7 to hide it.

All three phones also have fingerprint scanners on the back, though the G7’s is better placed and a better, circular shape. But it is the first time in ages that LG didn’t make it a physical button – instead the power button is on the right-hand side, like on the S9.

While the S9 fixed the rubbish fingerprint sensor placement of the S8, it’s still a weird position and shape, right below the camera.

The S9 Plus totes two cameras compared to the S9’s one, and the G7 has two. The G7 keeps the wide angle capabilities from the G6 and V30 but also adds portrait mode for the first time, making it more versatile than the S9.

The regular S9 gets neither of these modes but does have the same main sensor as the S9 Plus that has a physically variable aperture for improved low light photography.

Both the S9 and The G7 are odd in that they have physical buttons for digital assistants. Samsung’s wakes up its own Bixby, while pressing it on the G7 gets you Google Assistant. Both can call up the assistants with a push, or you can press and hold to speak a command like a walkie talkie.

Both can be disabled, and it’s a bit of annoying addition that we feel won’t catch on.

Thankfully both S9s and the G7 ThinQ have headphone jacks – excellent if you still despise not having one, and good considering all three phones are IP68 waterrproof.

The G7’s headphone jack is the one for audiophiles though, with a Quad DAC system that dramatically improves sound quality, with user-controlled settings in the software to adjust to your tastes. It’s excellent, and better than the S9.

Battery life on the S9 and S9 Plus will get you through a day, but they aren’t the best on the market. Battery drain while locked is quite high, but only heavy users need take caution. We’ll compare the G7 when we’ve fully tested it, but it’s 3000mAh battery is the same as the regular S9, while the S9 Plus has 3500mAh.

All phones ship with Android 8.0 Oreo but with quite different skins. Samsung Experience on the S9 phones is quite nicely refined for the hardware design with curved edges to app icons and good integration of apps edge, where you can drag in on a tab and access apps or widgets from any screen.

Transitions are quite different from stock Android and if you buy the phone from an operator you’ll probably get some bloatware. Samsung also insists on giving you email, calendar and other apps to duplicate what Google services give you which is easy enough to ignore, but is being seen less.

It’s much the same story on the G7 – LG’s skin is heavy and changes a lot in settings menus and the notification shade. LG has done a good job of modernising Oreo, as its Nougat skin was a bit too square and straight faced.

It’ll come down to personal preference, but there is little performance difference between the two.

LG G7 ThinQ: Specs
  • 6.1in 19.5:9 (3120x1440, 564ppi) MLCD+ display, Gorilla Glass 5
  • Android Oreo 8.0 with UX 6.0+ and Google Assistant
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  • 4 / 6GB LPDDR4
  • 64 / 128 UFS 2.0, microSD up to 2TB(?)
  • 16Mp f/1.6 + 16Mp f/1.9 wide-angle cameras, 8Mp f/1.9 selfie camera
  • 802.11ac Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, USB-C (3.1)
  • IP68, MIL-SPEC 810G compliant, 32-bit Hi-Fi Quad DAC, face/voice/fingerprint recognition
  • 3,000mAh, wired and wireless charging, Quick Charge 3.0
  • 153.2x71.9x7.9mm
  • 162g


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Popular posts from this blog

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Release Date & Specs

The Snapdragon 855 has 3x the AI performance of the 845 and will enable portrait mode in HDR 4K video.
At its annual Tech Summit, this year held in Hawaii, Qualcomm unveiled its next-generation smartphone chip, the Snapdragon 855. It is the first to offer 5G and will be in many of the 2019 flagships from Samsung, OnePlus, Google and other phone manufacturers.

Vorwerk Kobold VR300 Review

At nearly £1000, does the VR300 offer enough to justify the purchase when you can pick up a robot vac for £100s less? Find out in our Vorwerk Kobold VR300 review
Should I Buy The Vorwerk Kobold VR300?
It’s expensive, but the Kobold VR300 provides an impressive vacuuming experience that we think could rival that of a conventional vacuum cleaner, but it’s not as smart as some rivals – yet. The low-profile design, upgraded SLAM technology and D-shape design allow the VR300 to safely navigate around obstacles and reach every last nook and cranny.

Chicken Nachos

Chicken Nachos are the perfect thing for a busy weeknight dinner. They are easy to throw together using leftover chicken and can be customized using whatever Mexican toppings your gang enjoys.

Hot Cinnamon Hard Candy

Hot Cinnamon Hard Candy just screams Christmas cheer! We always get so many compliments when we make this recipe. I’ll share Top 10 tips for making Cinnamon Candy. And don’t forget it makes a wonderful gift.

Samsung 860 Evo Review

For those people still booting their systems from hard drives there is a simple direct replacement that will give their computer a performance kick in the pants. The Samsung 860 Evo is a great choice.
Should I Buy The Samsung 860 Evo?
If you’ve got an NVMe PCI M.2 port on your system you’ll probably want Samsung’s 960 Evo in that form factor, but for everyone else the SATA model the new Evo is an excellent option.
It’s not substantially quicker than the model it replaces, but the extended lifespan is certainly worth the modest investment.

Like Fan Page